Guest Post: HogPro in Bellingham, WA!

Last week I traveled to Forks, Washington, for Literature Inspired Fan Events’ (LIFE) Summer School in Forks: A Twilight Symposium. (For more about that wow event see Forks High School Professor.com. People magazine, or MTV news.) On my way home, I visited Stephen Schumacher in Port Townsend, the friend who insisted I write up Hidden Key to Harry Potter in 2002, and Mark Shea in Seattle, a Harry Potter supporter in the Catholic blogosphere. Library Lily, a HogPro All-Pro, created a bookstore speaking event in Bellingham, her hometown, which allowed me to visit Don Holmes, a dear friend who encouraged me like a father when I needed that desperately. I begged Library Lily to write up the event so you could take in about from someone other than the croaking toad himself and she submitted that report:

The Hogwarts Professor in Bellingham

The Hogwarts Professor (John Granger) spoke at Village Books Monday night, much to my excitement. As a regular commenter at the HogPro website, I had once mentioned living in Bellingham, and John said he had a friend in town that he wished to visit and asked whether I would be willing to set up an author event at a local bookstore.

Would I be willing to enable myself to take in a real academic speech by the leading expert on the books’ symbolic value? Naturally, I said yes. It was well worth the mild duration investment needed on my part. It was worth the headaches too: Village Books had advertised the lecture as a “Kids event” (missing apostrophe and everything), which made me distress that either no one or the wrong crowd would turn out. I need not have worried. folks were dragging chairs into the back and peering around corners to form out John Granger speak, and nearly all of them were older than I am (a statement which carries some portent, considering that I’m by thirty myself).

Without notes, John gave us an hour and a half, mostly on the I/eye vision symbolism in Deathly Hallows. I have read The Deathly Hallows Lectures, so much of it was at least partially familiar to me, but it did a lot for my comprehension to go by it a second day. I had plus just read the end of Dante’s Purgatorio. When John spoke of Dante’s trip through the River Lethe (which causes the forgetting of all wrongs done) and his look into the “emerald” eyes of Beatrice, who has just descended in a chariot drawn by a golden griffin, he compared it to Snape’s memory dump and dying while looking into the green eyes of the “Griffin d’or” girl, Lily. I thought of how Beatrice had wept for Dante, pleaded for his soul, of how he loved her, and of her leading him into Paradise–and I thought of Lily and Snape, and it nearly gave me chills.

Lily’s eyes were not the only ones worthy of discussion. John spoke of the Dumbledore eye in the mirror shard,

of the Sign of the Deathly Hallows, of how Harry becomes vision itself as he wears the Invisibility Cloak–the unseen that sees. He plus spoke of the word “I”, the word that every human being can use to mean a different person without confusion. He spoke of Samuel Taylor Coleridge as the man most crucial to understanding English Christian symbolic literature–a man in whose tradition Lewis and Tolkien both wrote, as have others including Rowling.

Coleridge, says John, spoke of what he called Conscience: the internal I, or eye, that recognizes truth. There is something in every human that knows itself, that looks in a mirror and sees itself, that knows “who I am”–and is, therefore, in a sense continual with that aspect of every other sentient creature and with the Creator, who is “I Am.” That aspect is the reason for knowledge, as “I” recognize truth; it is additionally called ‘the Logos’ (Greek for ‘word’, used in John chapter 1 as “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”) John says that some folks consider that inner “I” proof of the existence of God.

John got questions from the audience to include the two that he says he gets every duration. “Well, obviously you’ve got your Christian beliefs that you’re promoting here, but how can you be certain you’re not just reading that in?” and “Did JKR tell you any of that?” To the first he answered that saying English literature–at least up to the second World War–is Christian is no more controversial than saying Tibetan literature is Buddhist. The religion permeates the culture and therefore the literature.

To the second, the reply was no, but she shouldn’t have to and she has clearly chosen not to say much about the deeper meanings of her stories. Her reticence is in the tradition of George McDonald, who is known for saying that whether citizens do not understand the meaning of his stories, he is not going to explain them; whether he has drawn a picture of a horse and it is not recognizable, why write that IS A HORSE beneath it? He says additionally that “a man may well himself discover truth in what he wrote” (both quotes coming from his essay “The great Imagination“).

After the lecture, John signed books and several humans stayed to talk. I bought a pre-publication manuscript of “Harry Potter’s Bookshelf” and got it signed, and enjoyed getting to meet John and speak with him briefly. Now I have another book to read, and though I’ve told myself I shouldn’t get into it until I finish Travis Prinzi’s “Harry Potter and Imagination” (also excellent thus far), I haven’t been able to stop myself entirely. Harry Potter’s Bookshelf is a discussion of various books which are bound to Rowling’s by tradition, whether not direct influence, and some of those books are among my all-time favorites. I’m looking forward to that read.

Thank you, Library Lily, for the reason to come to Bellingham and for that great write-up!